Skip to content
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB): In‐Depth Benchmark Review & Performance Analysis

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB): In‐Depth Benchmark Review & Performance Analysis

✨ Introduction

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB, built on Blackwell architecture with GDDR7 memory and DLSS 4 support, positions itself as a compelling mid-range option in 2025. Promising a meaningful uplift over the RTX 4060 Ti, this 16 GB variant improves performance without a drastic price hike and avoids VRAM bottlenecks in modern games.


🔍 Key Specifications

  • CUDA Cores: ~4,608

  • Memory: 16 GB GDDR7, ~448 GB/s bandwidth

  • Memory Bus: 128‑bit

  • Clock Speed: ~2.57 GHz boost

  • MSRP: ~$429 (street prices may vary) 

This model notably outpaces the 8 GB version in modern titles where VRAM and bandwidth matter.


📈 Synthetic Benchmark Results

  • 3DMark Time Spy v1.2: RTX 5060 Ti achieves ~15,829 vs 12,847 for RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB—a 23% uplift.

  • Content & compute benchmarks (Vulkan / OpenCL): Scores around 140,147 / 146,234—about 14% to 13% ahead of RTX 4060 Ti.

These figures confirm consistent year-over-year gains, especially in compute and DXR workloads.


🎮 Real-World Gaming Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077 (1080p, Path Tracing Overdrive + DLSS 4 Super + Frame Generation ×4)

  • avg. FPS ~179, 1% low ~98 FPS, up from ~56 FPS without frame generation

  • Massive improvement over RTX 4060 Ti (~87 FPS) 

Doom Eternal (Ultra Nightmare, RT @4K)

  • avg. FPS ~105, 1% low ~68 FPS; DLSS Quality boosts to ~130 FPS avg, 98 FPS 1% low—smooth in a scenario even 8 GB cards can’t handle 

Dying Light 2 (1440p)

  • avg. 66 FPS, roughly 22% faster than RTX 4060 Ti and close to RX 7800 XT performance.

Dragon’s Dogma II / Starfield / Black Myth Wukong (1440p)

  • Black Myth: ~57 FPS (13% ahead of 4060 Ti; between RTX 4070 and RX 7800 XT)

  • Starfield: ~65 FPS avg (13% gain over 4060 Ti)

  • Dragon’s Dogma II: ~70 FPS avg (22% faster than 4060 Ti)
    These results position the 5060 Ti slightly below AMD's RX 7800 XT in raster, but competitive with 4070 in many titles.


⚖️ Performance vs. RTX 4060 Ti & Competitors

Metric RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Synthetic/Compute ~23% higher (e.g. Time Spy)
1080p Gaming ~15–17% uplift
1440p Gaming ~25–27% uplift
4K (RT/DLSS) ~65% uplift
VRAM & Bandwidth Limits 8 GB model performance significantly weaker 

It consistently outperforms its predecessor, especially at higher resolutions, though AMD's RX 7800 XT often matches or surpasses it in raster-heavy titles at times.


🔧 Power, Thermals & Efficiency

  • Thermals and fan control remain efficient—e.g., Zotac Twin Edge OC variant stays below 79 °C at 30% RPM, down to ~53 °C at 100% RPM, with minimal clock deviation (~45 MHz).

  • Power draw rises modestly compared to the 4060 Ti, but performance-per-watt improvement is solid given the memory and compute gains.


✅ Final Verdict

The RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB presents a strong mid-range card:

  • It delivers significant uplift over the RTX 4060 Ti, notably at 1440p and above.

  • It avoids VRAM starvation in demanding modern games.

  • DLSS 4 and multi-frame generation amplify its value.

  • However, it's priced higher (street prices near $500), and AMD's RX 7800 XT occasionally offers better value in raster workloads 

If you're gaming at 1080p or 1440p with DLSS-capable titles, the 5060 Ti is an intelligent choice. For heavier ray tracing or 4K without upscaling, higher-end cards may be a better fit.






Cart 0

Your cart is currently empty.

Start Shopping